The Oxford Seminar in the Psychology of Music (OSPoM)
The Oxford Seminar in the Psychology of Music (OSPoM) features leading researchers presenting a wide variety of topics in the intersection between music and psychology. The Seminar is convened by Eric Clarke (University of Oxford). The seminars start at 5.15pm GMT, and last for 90 minutes - 45 minutes of presentation followed by 45 minutes of discussion. These seminars are open to all and are hosted in a hybrid format: join in person (in the Committee Room of the Oxford Faculty of Music) or remotely via Zoom - please see the individual event listings for joining details.
Calendar of speakers 2023-24:
- Tuesday 10 October 2023: Alexander Refsum Jensenius (University of Oslo and RITMO) 'Still Standing: The effects of sound and music on people standing still'
- Tuesday 7 November 2023: Mats Küssner (Humboldt University, Berlin) 'Sonic Visions: How music navigates the visual pathways of the mind'
- Tuesday 6 February 2024: Daniel Müllensiefen (Goldsmiths University of London and University of Music, Drama, and Media at Hannover) 'The Development of Cognitive and Musical Abilities: Preliminary Results of a Longitudinal Study'
- Tuesday 5 March 2024: Landon Peck (University of Sheffield) 'Investigations into the psychology of musical awe'
- Tuesday 28 May 2024: Speaker TBC
See the tabs below for speakers and abstracts of previous seminars.
Alexandra Lamont (Keele University): What can Musical Memories tell us about Musical Preferences? (17 February 2021)
Existing research into music preferences has illustrated, broadly, that different people seem to prefer different types of music and at different ages, with some suggestions that context may also play a role. In this talk I present new data exploring preferences through musical memories, using a variety of recognition and recall techniques (experiments, self-reports, and interviews). The data shed light on people’s memories of a wide range of music over the lifespan and, more importantly, the influences on these memories. The talk will cover details of theories, methods and evidence on questions of musical memories and preferences.
Renee Timmers (University of Sheffield): A Probabilistic Analysis of Emotion and Meaning in Music (3 March 2021)
Perception of emotion and meaning in music is to a large extent probabilistic rather than deterministic. Certain properties of music may increase the likelihood that a particular emotion is perceived over another or a particular imagery or association is evoked. What emotion or imagery is perceived also depends on contextual factors such as the a priori probability of emotions, listeners’ sensitivities and biases, and the distinctiveness of the properties within the musical context. In this presentation, I will explore the use of Bayes’ rule to model the perception of emotion and meaning, and to capture the influence of these contextually shaping factors.
Considering emotion perception according to Bayes’ rule, the posterior probability of perceiving an emotion given a musical property M is equal to the likelihood of the observation of the musical property if the hypothesis of that emotion was true, times the prior probability of that emotion (in the context of competing emotions). To develop this method, measures of prior probability of emotions are required as well as probability estimates of musical properties in emotional expressions. Analogously, the posterior probability of multimodal imagery given musical property M is equal to the likelihood of that musical property in the context of the hypothesised multimodal phenomenon, additionally taking into account the prior probability of the phenomenon and the frequency of occurrence of the musical property across multimodal phenomena. Finally, probability calculations can be used to examine relationships between emotion and meaning in music: what is the posterior probability of an emotion given a multimodal association or conversely what is the probability of a given multimodal imagery given an emotion?
Data from existing research articles are used to get a proof of concept of these applications of Bayes’ rule to model perception of emotion and meaning in music. Future directions for research are discussed as well as benefits and limitations of the adoption of a Bayesian approach to music cognition.
Diana Omigie (Goldsmiths, University of London): Music listening as a window into the aesthetic pleasure of information seeking (12 May 2021)
Information seeking may be defined as the motivation to seek and explore information in the environment. The availability of computational tools that allow the information theoretic properties of musical events to be objectively quantified thus makes music an optimal testbed for studying this important drive. In this talk, I will first present studies in which we have used depth-electrode intracranial recordings to examine the cortical and subcortical correlates of music-induced surprise and uncertainty. I will then present studies that, using computational modelling, provide evidence of music’s ability to induce curiosity as a function of the idiosyncrasies of its unfolding structure. Finally, I will provide evidence that individual differences in trait curiosity may account for variations in the timepoints at which listeners derive maximal enjoyment from music. Several theories suggest a role of curiosity and interest in the aesthetic response, but the potential of musical stimuli to throw light on these epistemic emotions are still under-exploited. I will close with recommendations as to how musical stimuli might be useful in addressing important open questions in the cognitive neurosciences of information seeking.
Ian Cross (University of Cambridge): Affiliative Interaction in Music and Speech (26 May 2021)
Most research into language-music relationships has privileged language in the comparisons that it makes between the two domains. Music has generally been explored as though it were a sonic domain made up of complex patterns that can elicit aesthetic or hedonic responses, while studies of language are founded on its capacity to express complex propositions that can reflect states of affairs in the world. While music may resemble language in its combinatorial properties, in comparison with language it lacks the all-important property of compositionality; it thus appears to be a pale analogue of language with limited utility and little relevance outside the realm of entertainment. This view is, however, completely controverted by the fact that across cultures music constitutes a participatory medium for communicative interaction with diverse and significant functions. Participatory music displays features and involves processes that equip it to manage social relations by inducing a sense of mutual affiliation between participants. At least some of those features and processes are present in other modes of human interaction, particularly those genres of speech concerned with establishing or continuing mutual affiliation or attachment, generally termed "phatic". I suggest that music as an interactive medium intersects so significantly with speech in the phatic register as to be indistinguishable from it. I hypothesise that affiliative communicative interaction need be neither music nor speech, but that these are best construed as culturally-constituted categories of human behaviour; the superordinate and generalisable category into which both fall is that of human affiliative communicative behaviour, which can be claimed in different cultures to be music, speech, or any one of a range of other categories in other possible taxonomies of human communicative behaviour. This paper will survey evidence from ethnomusicology, linguistics and the cognitive sciences of music, and from recent research at Cambridge into spontaneous interaction in speech and music, that lends support to this hypothesis.